Trump pulls surgeon general nominee Janette Nesheiwat after questions about her medical education
Trump pulls surgeon general nominee Janette Nesheiwat after questions about her medical education
October 7, 2025

Trump pulls surgeon general nominee Janette Nesheiwat after questions about her medical education

Summary

Dr. Janette Nesheiwat is an American physician whose nomination by President Donald Trump in 2024 for the position of U.S. Surgeon General was withdrawn amid controversy over her medical education and credentials. Although she completed her medical degree at the American University of the Caribbean School of Medicine and residency in family medicine at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, questions arose regarding discrepancies in her résumé, including claims of double board certification and misrepresentations about the institutions she attended. These issues prompted intensified public and political scrutiny, contributing to the withdrawal of her nomination shortly before her scheduled Senate confirmation hearing.
The controversy began when independent journalist Anthony Clark publicly highlighted inconsistencies in Nesheiwat’s stated qualifications, such as an erroneous claim on LinkedIn that she earned her medical degree from the University of Arkansas School of Medicine, which she did not. Critics also noted vague references to attending “American University” without clarification, potentially misleading some about the nature of her education. Medical ethicists emphasized that such misrepresentations undermine the credibility essential for the Surgeon General’s role, a position that relies heavily on public trust and transparent communication about medical expertise.
Opposition from conservative activists, particularly Laura Loomer, who criticized Nesheiwat’s prior support for COVID-19 vaccines, further complicated her nomination and intensified political resistance. Following the withdrawal, President Trump nominated Dr. Casey Means as a replacement and indicated Nesheiwat would continue serving within the Department of Health and Human Services in a different capacity. The episode underscored the increased scrutiny and challenges faced by federal nominees, especially those in prominent public health positions, regarding the verification of professional credentials and transparency.

Background

Janette Nesheiwat attended Umatilla High School before earning a Bachelor of Science in Biology from the University of South Florida in 2000. She also completed coursework at Stetson University and participated in the U.S. Army Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC), including advanced officer training at Fort Lewis and Fort Drum. Ultimately, she chose to pursue a medical degree, attending the American University of the Caribbean School of Medicine in St. Maarten from August 2000 to April 2006, where she received her medical degree. Following medical school, Nesheiwat completed her residency in family medicine at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences from 2006 to 2009, which she has described as a formative period under outstanding physician mentors.
Nesheiwat has frequently been described as double board-certified in family and emergency medicine, including on her own website and during media appearances such as on CBS News. However, investigations have only verified her certification in family medicine. Her LinkedIn profile lists a Doctor of Medicine degree from the University of Arkansas School of Medicine, a claim that has been disputed; records confirm she earned her medical degree from the American University of the Caribbean, not from the University of Arkansas. Additionally, on some social media occasions, she has referenced attending “American University” without clarifying that this institution is distinct from the American University in Washington, D.C., which does not have a medical school.
Critics have pointed out inconsistencies and alterations in Nesheiwat’s narrative about her education and credentials, suggesting a pattern of embellishment intended to portray a more successful and credentialed professional image. Despite these questions, her claims of double board certification have gone largely unchallenged in public forums until recently. A spokesperson from the University of Arkansas confirmed that while she completed her residency there, she did not obtain her medical degree from that institution.
These issues around her medical education and board certifications became significant during her nomination for U.S. Surgeon General, with questions about her background intensifying in the public and political arenas. Prior to her scheduled confirmation hearing before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, the White House withdrew her nomination amid growing scrutiny.

Controversy

Questions regarding Janette Nesheiwat’s medical education and credentials arose publicly following her nomination as U.S. Surgeon General. Independent journalist Anthony Clark first brought attention to discrepancies in her résumé on Substack, which led to increased scrutiny of her qualifications. Critics highlighted that while Nesheiwat is frequently described as double board-certified, including on her own website and during media appearances, CBS News was only able to verify her certification in family medicine. Furthermore, her LinkedIn profile incorrectly listed a Doctor of Medicine degree from the University of Arkansas School of Medicine, omitting her actual medical degree from the American University of the Caribbean (AUC) School of Medicine in St. Maarten, where she was enrolled from 2000 to 2006.
Additional concerns centered on Nesheiwat’s statements about her education, such as referencing attendance at “American University” without clarifying it was not the American University in Washington, D.C., which lacks a medical school. She also claimed to have completed most of her studies at St. Thomas & Guy’s Hospital in London, England, a detail CBS News was unable to verify with the institution’s overseeing foundation. These inconsistencies raised alarms about transparency and credibility, particularly given the importance of trust in the Surgeon General role. Medical ethicist Dr. Arthur Caplan described the misleading statements as “very, very troubling,” emphasizing that the position depends heavily on public trust and accurate representation of qualifications.
The controversy contributed to her eventual withdrawal from the confirmation process, which was first reported by Bloomberg News following public opposition from conservative activist Laura Loomer, who criticized Nesheiwat’s prior support for COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic. Efforts by CBS News to obtain comments from Nesheiwat and the White House regarding these issues were unsuccessful.

Withdrawal of Nomination

President Donald Trump withdrew the nomination of Dr. Janette Nesheiwat, a former Fox News medical contributor, for the position of U.S. Surgeon General following questions about her medical education and credentials. The decision came amid criticism from conservative activist Laura Loomer, who opposed Nesheiwat’s confirmation due to her support for COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic.
The withdrawal occurred just one day before Nesheiwat was scheduled to appear before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. Concerns about the accuracy of her resume were first highlighted by independent journalist Anthony Clark on Substack, prompting further scrutiny. Medical ethicist Dr. Arthur Caplan of New York University emphasized that trust and credibility are critical for the Surgeon General’s role and described any misleading statements regarding training as “very, very troubling”.
Following the withdrawal, President Trump announced he would nominate Dr. Casey Means for Surgeon General instead and stated that Nesheiwat would continue to work at the Department of Health and Human Services in a different capacity. The White House and Nesheiwat did not respond to requests for comment from CBS News.

Aftermath

Following the withdrawal of Janette Nesheiwat’s nomination as U.S. Surgeon General, significant scrutiny and public debate arose regarding her medical credentials and transparency. Conservative activist Laura Loomer openly opposed Nesheiwat’s confirmation, citing her prior support for COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic as a point of contention. The White House officially pulled Nesheiwat’s nomination just one day before her scheduled Senate HELP Committee confirmation hearing, with congressional aides noting that the reasons for her withdrawal were not fully clarified but were widely believed to be related to the questions surrounding her medical education.
Medical ethicists and public health experts emphasized the importance of transparency and credibility for the surgeon general position. Dr. Arthur Caplan of New York University described the situation as “very, very troubling,” underscoring that the role depends heavily on trust and the ability to serve as a clear spokesperson and educator for the public. Criticism focused on Nesheiwat’s lack of disclosure regarding her Caribbean medical education in her 2024 autobiographical book, *Beyond the Stethoscope: Miracles in Medicine*, as well as discrepancies in the representation of her training background.
Attempts by CBS News to obtain comments from both Nesheiwat and the White House went unanswered. A spokesperson for the University of Arkansas clarified that while Nesheiwat completed her residency in family medicine there, she did not earn her medical degree from that institution. The controversy surrounding her nomination highlighted the heightened scrutiny nominees face regarding qualifications and transparency, especially for a role that sets national public health priorities.
Nesheiwat’s withdrawal mirrored a broader pattern of several of former President Donald Trump’s nominees stepping back from high-profile positions amid controversies. Other notable withdrawals included former Representative Matt Gaetz from the Justice Department nomination and Florida Sheriff Chad Chronister from the Drug Enforcement Administration nomination. The episode underscored challenges in the vetting process for federal appointments during the Trump administration.


The content is provided by Sierra Knightley, Direct Bulletins

Sierra

October 7, 2025
Breaking News
Sponsored
Featured

You may also like

[post_author]